Timeline: History of the Earth: Age of Promise Year 2108 - Year 2698
History of Creation
|
|||
Year
|
Event
|
Notes
|
Date in B.C.E (Before the Common Era)
|
2108
|
Isaac is born in this year.
Before this, however, Abraham travels to Gerar and makes a covenant
with Abimelech. Sarah becomes
pregnant. After Isaac is weaned, Sarah
urges Abraham to send Ishmael and Hagar away.
Abraham sends them away. The
3rd Age begins; the Age of Promise.
|
If you notice in this story, God protects Hagar and Ishmael the whole
time. It wasn't their faults that all this terrible stuff was happening to
them. Yes, God knew that Ishmael would
be the father of the nation of Islam which would come against His people
later in history. He could have
stopped this from happening by simply allowing Hagar and Ishmael to die in
the Arabian Desert. However, God loved
Hagar and Ishmael too, for He is the God of all the Earth. These two were not guilty of sin. They suffered because of the sins of
Abraham and Sarah. Therefore, once
again, we see that God is good and righteous.
Mankind, however, suffers because of their own sins. Islam and Judaism and Christianity war
today not because of God but because of the sins of mankind. Sarah sinned by first not trusting God that
God could and would fulfill His promise to Abraham. That's why she took matters into her own
hands and pressured Abraham to sleep with Hagar. Abraham sinned the same sin that Adam had
committed. He allowed his wife to
pressure him into losing faith in God.
Instead of standing up for what is right, Abraham allowed Sarah to
talk him into taking matters into his own hands. (Note: Unlike Adam, pride was not an issue
with Abraham. I am merely pointing out
that Abraham sinned because he, like Adam, did not stand up for what was
right but allowed his wife to persuade him to do wrong.) Abraham even went so far as to send Hagar
and Ishmael to their deaths because he would not stand up to his wife
Sarah. In a sense, he was sending them
to their deaths. However, at least
with Abraham, he trusted that God would somehow save Hagar and Ishmael. Sarah, however, didn't care. She just wanted them gone and if they died
they died. This is not to say that
Abraham and Sarah were bad people.
Abraham was always forgiven for these sins because his heart was
towards God. Sarah, God knew, was only
thinking of Isaac and the future of Abraham's line, which was normal for a
woman during this time. She just
wanted to make sure that Abraham, her beloved husband whom she loved so much,
would have a son to carry on his family line, the line of promise; the
lineage of Christ as promised in the Garden of Eden. I'm not excusing her sin by far, but what I
am saying is that a lot of women, in her position, would have done what she
did. She was old, she couldn't have
children, she didn't have faith enough to see that God could make something
like her having a baby happen at that point, and the only solution she could
see was to have her servant produce for him an heir, which was a common
practice for women in her position during those days. Then she got jealous and stupid, thinking
to herself how unfair it was that some Egyptian woman could have a baby for
her husband but she couldn't, and she certainly didn't like that Hagar was
enjoying her newfound position as Abraham's mate. Then, the final straw, Ishmael at age 14
was making fun of Isaac and acting like Isaac would not be Abraham's heir,
since he was the oldest. Oh no! Sarah would not have that. She did not care what would happen to that
boy at that point. She wasn't about to
have her son, the son of promise, ruled over by some Egyptian woman's
son. So once again she took matters
into her own hands instead of just trusting that God would make sure Isaac
was blessed and would be Abraham's heir even if the two brothers had grown up
together. So yes it was totally wrong,
but I could see lots of people, even today, doing the same thing if they were
in her shoes. Unfortunately, because
of it, now we all have to suffer, to this day, the war between Islam and
Judaism/Christianity.
|
1977
|
2126
|
Sarlah dies
|
1959
|
|
2145
|
Sarah dies at 127 years old.
|
1940
|
|
2148
|
Eliezer is sent by Abraham to find a wife for Isaac. He meets Rebekah and brings her back to
Isaac to be Isaac's wife.
|
Eliezer was such a good guy.
He served Abraham faithfully for all the years and all the crazy
things that Abraham experienced in the land of Canaan. He even served Abraham in finding a wife
for Isaac. Now before Isaac and
Ishmael were born, Abraham points out to God that Eliezer was Abraham's
heir. Therefore, Eliezer could have
been greedy and evil and he could have easily sabotaged Abraham and Isaac at
any point in order to steal all of the vast wealth Abraham had accumulated
over the years. Nevertheless, he
didn't, and he served Abraham even to the end. This indicates to me that Eliezer was
probably Abraham's best friend and more like a brother than a servant. One other thing I'd like to note during
this event is that in Genesis 22 we see the genealogy of Nahor and it tells
all about Nahor's sons. There is one
exception. Rebekah is mentioned. This is almost identical to the genealogy
of Cain in Genesis 4. Only Naamah is
mentioned among all the boys mentioned in that passage. As Rebekah is the only one mentioned here,
one of two possibilities exist. Either
she literally was the only girl or she was the only one of importance because
she was to be the wife of Isaac. I
think the second scenario is true, because in chapter 24 we see that Abraham
sends Eliezer to Nahor to find a wife for Isaac. Eliezer also has no idea which woman will
be the best for Isaac. Therefore,
Eliezer prays to God to ask God to make it plain which woman should be
Isaac's wife. If Rebekah was the only
girl in Nahor's family, Abraham would have simply sent Eliezer to ask for her
hand in marriage and Eliezer would have prayed that God move the heart of
Rebekah's father so that he might be willing to do this. Instead, neither Abraham nor Eliezer knew
who would be good for Isaac, so they simply trusted God for the answer. This would only be the case if she wasn't
the only girl. This lends credibility
to my theory that Naamah was the wife of Seth and that like Rebekah, she was
only mentioned in the genealogy because of her connection to Adam's family. In fact, like Rebekah's genealogy, I
suspect that Cain's genealogy wouldn't have been written in Genesis at all if
Naamah wasn't connected to the family in some way, either as Seth's wife or
Enosh's. Since Enosh is just born at
the end of that chapter, this is why I suspect that Naamah was Seth's wife
instead.
|
1937
|
2150
|
Abraham marries Keturah.
|
This is an approximate date.
The Bible doesn't really give us any indication as to when this occurred. Note that this mention of Keturah and her
sons is presented here largely because it later influenced the life of Moses
and the Israelites. One of Keturah's
sons is Midian, and it was in Midianite country that Moses had fled after
murdering the Egyptian slave-driver.
Moses' first wife was also a Midianite. Therefore, their lineage was of importance.
|
1935
|
2158
|
Shem dies at 600 years old.
|
1927
|
|
2168
|
Esau and Jacob are born.
|
At some point near this event, there is a famine again like there was
during the days of Abraham and Isaac makes a covenant with Abimelech. It is unclear whether Jacob and Esau were
born yet or if it happened prior to them being born. I tend to wonder if it was prior to them
being born since Isaac tells Abimelech that Rebekah is his sister, just as
Abraham had with Sarah. If there were
children, Abimelech might have gotten suspicious that she was the mother, for
certainly the children would have been with their mother. Therefore, it is most likely that earlier
in the year that the twins were born, Isaac and Rebekah came to Gerar to
escape the famine and this event occurred.
Then, after being blessed with Abimelech, Rebekah became pregnant with
Jacob and Esau and had them that same year.
Around this time, the pharaoh in Egypt that Isaac and Rebekah visited,
was likely Mentuhotep III. His family
lineage is mostly a mystery, and he is not a pharaoh of any repute. Again, as with Abram, the situation is
similar. The Bible also seems to imply
that the pharaoh of Isaac's time is not a very major pharaoh. He seems almost like the king of a lesser
nation, like Abimelech.
|
1917
|
2183
|
Abraham dies at 175 years old.
|
1902
|
|
2187
|
Eber dies
|
1898
|
|
2208
|
Esau marries Judith and Basemath.
|
1877
|
|
2231
|
Ishmael dies at 137 years old.
|
1854
|
|
2238
|
Isaac gives Jacob his blessing.
Jacob leaves. Esau marries
Mahalath. Jacob serves Laban 7 years
for Leah, 7 years for Rachel and 7 more years. He has all of his children during this 21
years.
|
1847
|
|
2259
|
Joseph is born. Jacob asks
Laban to allow him to return to Canaan.
Laban makes a deal with Jacob, and Jacob uses a trick to acquire most
of Laban's flocks. Jacob then flees to
Canaan. At some point during this
time, Jacob meets up with Esau again and then settles in Shechem. The incident with Dinah occurs and the sons
of Jacob slaughter the Shechemites, plundering all of their goods. Therefore, Jacob leaves Shechem and begins
to make his way to Bethel.
|
1826
|
|
2268
|
Jacob returns to Canaan.
Benjamin is born. Rachel dies
in Canaan near Bethlehem.
|
This is an approximate date, for the Bible does not really give any
indication as to when Benjamin was born and when Rachel died.
|
1817
|
2276
|
Joseph is 17 when sold to Egypt.
|
1809
|
|
2287
|
Joseph is wrongly accused by Potiphar's wife. He is locked in prison and interprets the
dreams of the baker and the butler.
|
1798
|
|
2288
|
Isaac dies at 180 years old.
|
1797
|
|
2289
|
Joseph is 30 when he begins to rule in Egypt.
|
Senusret II seems to fit very nicely as the king of Egypt during this
time. His reign would likely have
begun roughly around 1897 B.C.E. and it lasted most likely until 1878
B.C.E. If you notice, however, the date
in this timeline shows that Joseph was in Egypt about 1796 B.C.E. Nevertheless, if you look at the Egyptian
timeline according to historians you will find a lot of disagreements and a
lot of hypotheses. Some even say that
the timeline that is typically provided could be off as much as 350
years. Therefore, it wouldn't be that
far off to assume Senusret II was the king during this time especially if we
consider that we bumped the date of when Djedkare Isesi's reign began, as
noted in the Year 1757. The first clue
that Senusret II is likely the king is Senusret II had no listed military
campaigns and in fact built up relations in Egypt and the Near East. During Senusret II's reign, Egypt went
through a period of prosperity and peace.
This fits perfectly because Joseph increased the wealth and prosperity
of Egypt by selling the stored up grain to all the neighboring lands, uniting
Egypt and creating good relations with the other nations by saving their
lives during the great famine of that time.
Also, Senusret II focused a lot on implementing new irrigation systems
and the cultivation of land to increase Egypt's crop productions. It seemed he focused a good deal on
expanding the natural resources, both food and water, in Egypt. Why was he so focused on this? Could it be that Joseph was the one to
encourage these projects and to manage them during those 7 years of plenty so
that by the time the 7 years of famine hit they had enough food stores? Finally, I believe that Ahmose I was the
pharaoh who rose up at the time of Moses' birth, when the Egyptians enslaved
the Hebrews and slaughtered the newborns.
Ahmose I fits very well into the profile of the pharaoh of that time,
and he came about 347 years after Senusret II. If my timeline is correct, there were
actually only 329 years between the two, but again, historians don't seem to
have a solid timeline.
|
1796
|
2296
|
Joseph is 37 when the Famine begins.
|
1789
|
|
2297
|
Joseph's brothers come to him for food for the first time.
|
1788
|
|
2298
|
Jacob enters Egypt at 130 years old.
Before this occurs, the brothers come to Joseph again in hopes of
getting food, this time bringing Benjamin.
Joseph is 39.
|
The timeline of Joseph and Jacob is a bit difficult to piece
together. One must first go to this
year, when Jacob enters Egypt, and then backtrack from here to put together
the full timeline. Jacob was 130 years
old when he entered Egypt. That means
that if he was born in the Year 2168, he entered Egypt in the Year 2298. Joseph was 30 when he rose to power in
Egypt. He immediately began to manage
the crops for 7 years, storing it up.
Therefore, Joseph was 37 when the famine began. At one point, Joseph tells his brothers
that the famine had been going on for 2 years, and this occurred just before
they went and fetched Jacob and brought him into Egypt. Therefore, Joseph was 39 when Jacob entered
Egypt. That means that Joseph was born
in the year 2259, for that was 39 years prior to 2298. This being the case, we can then determine
that Jacob left Isaac to go work for Laban in the Year 2238 because he served
Laban for 21 years, and the scriptures say that just after Joseph was born
Jacob left Laban.
|
1787
|
2315
|
Jacob dies at 147 years old.
|
1770
|
|
2369
|
Joseph dies at 110 years old
|
Note that finally the mortality rate of humans is dropping to close
to what God had said to Noah after the Flood.
It didn't happen overnight. It
was a process that took place over the span of hundreds of years.
|
1716
|
2618
|
Moses is born
|
Ahmose I fits very well into the Bible story about Moses and the
slaughter of the Hebrew children at Moses' birth. According to history, Kamose, Ahmose's
brother, along with practically Ahmose's entire family, were killed when
Thebes rebelled against the Hyksos, rulers of Lower Egypt. He was only seven when his father was
killed and ten when his brother, who had taken his father's throne, was
killed. Kamose was the last of the
17th dynasty, and Ahmose was the first of the 18th dynasty. During Ahmose's reign, he completed the
conquest and expulsion of the Hyksos and regained control over Egypt's former
subject territories of Nubia and Canaan.
He reorganized the administration of the country and reopened mines
and quarries and trade routes and began massive construction projects that
had not been undertaken since the time of the Middle Kingdom. Slavery in Egypt also began during his
rule. Therefore, it makes sense that,
in a time of great warfare and turmoil, Ahmose would have been a harsh tyrant
who would have seen the Israelites as a potential threat against his
enemies. He also, having lost his
family at a young age, would not have seen the murder of young babies as such
a big moral issue. To him, it would
have simply been the way of the world.
It is interesting to note that although some say that Ahmose's reign
began in 1550 B.C.E., according to other sources, it is possible that his
reign began as early as 1570. Since
his story seems to more fit as far as the profile for the pharaoh of the
story in the Bible, I think it makes sense that a good date for the beginning
of his reign is likely 1467 B.C.E., keeping in mind, again, that the timeline
most historians use is off here by about 100 years or so (see Year 2298. Wikipedia: Ahmose's reign can be fairly
accurately dated using the Heliacal rise of Sirius in his successor's reign,
but because of disputes over from where the observation was made, he has been
assigned a reign from 1570–1546, 1560–1537 and 1551–1527 by various sources.
|
1467
|
2658
|
Moses murders the Egyptian and flees Egypt to Midianite country.
|
If Ahmose I was king of Egypt when Moses was a baby, then the king
who ruled at the time Moses killed the Egyptian was Amenhotep I. His wife was Meritamun who was also his
sister. She died young, so even if she
was the one who had rescued Moses from the river, thus making him her son,
she would have likely died by this time.
Therefore, Amenhotep I would almost certainly not spare Moses from
justice over the killing of the Egyptian worker since his adopted mother was
no longer around to stand up for him.
This would explain why he fled Egypt in fear, for his adopted father,
Amenhotep I, was likely not very fond of him in the first place. This would have just given Amenhotep I
cause to get rid of Moses once and for all.
Amenhotep I never had an heir.
This likely means that he had problems conceiving, for he had several
wives. This also fits with the story
of Moses, for his wife, Ahmose I's daughter, Meritamun, would have wanted a
child for her own very badly. It was a
dishonor to her that she did not have any children, and they likely blamed
her. Thus, seeing Moses floating in a
river, she would have viewed it as if the gods were blessing her with a son
of her own. This means that Moses
would have likely been the true heir of Egypt, if he had not killed the
Egyptian and fled. Well, that is,
provided Amenhotep I actually considered him a son. Since Moses fled, I'm thinking he only kept
Moses around because of his late wife, and because she likely had told
everyone that he was a gift from the gods.
Therefore, no one would have wanted to cast Moses out for fear of
retribution from the gods. Amenhotep
died without an heir, since Moses fled, so Thutmose I became the new
king.
|
1427
|
2659
|
Caleb and Joshua are born
|
Thutmose I was married to Amenhotep I's sister Aames. That is likely why he took the throne upon
Amenhotep I's death, since Amenhotep I had no heirs. It is likely that Thutmose I began to rule
in about 1520 B.C.E. and his reign probably ended in 1508. He fits very well into the Biblical account. During his reign, he built up the Egyptian
military and led many campaigns. More
importantly, however, he was quite active in his building campaigns. This means that the poor Israelites would
have endured no end of harsh labor at his hand. Their cries most assuredly would have
increased towards God because of all that Thutmose I was forcing them to
do. Wikipedia: Thutmose I organized
great building projects during his reign, including many temples and tombs,
but his greatest projects were at the Temple of Karnak under the supervision
of the architect Ineni. Previous to
Thutmose, Karnak probably consisted only of a long road to a central
platform, with a number of shrines for the solar bark along the side of the
road. Thutmose was the first king to
drastically enlarge the temple.
Thutmose had the fifth pylon built along the temple's main road, along
with a wall to run around the inner sanctuary and two flagpoles to flank the
gateway. Outside of this, he built a
fourth pylon and another enclosure wall.
Between pylons four and five, he had a hypostyle hall constructed,
with columns made of cedar wood. This
type of structure was common in ancient Egyptian temples, and supposedly
represents a papyrus marsh, an Egyptian symbol of creation. Along the edge of this room he built
colossal statues, each one alternating wearing the crown of Upper Egypt and
the crown of Lower Egypt. Finally,
outside of the fourth pylon, he erected four more flagpoles and two obelisks,
although one of them, which now has fallen, was not inscribed until Thutmose
III inscribed it about 50 years later.
The cedar columns in Thutmose I's hypostyle hall were replaced with
stone columns by Thutmose III, however at least the northernmost two were
replaced by Thutmose I himself. Hatshepsut
also erected two of her own obelisks inside of Thutmose I's hypostyle
hall. In addition to Karnak, Thutmose
I also built statues of the Ennead at Abydos, buildings at Armant, Ombos,
el-Hiba, Memphis, and Edfu, as well as minor expansions to buildings in
Nubia, at Semna, Buhen, Aniba, and Quban.
Thutmose I was the first king who definitely was buried in the Valley
of the Kings.
| |
2680
|
Around this date Eleazar is born to Aaron. We know that he was born before the Exodus
for he is one of the sons consecrated as priest in Exodus before the
Wandering begins. However, he would
not have been 20 or older for only Joshua and Caleb were 20 or older at the
time of the Wandering.
|
1405
|
|
2698
|
Moses leads Israel out of Egypt; the Exodus begins. End of the Age of Promise.
|
Thutmose II seems to be the individual who most closely matches the
Biblical account as far as who the king was during the Exodus. Thutmose I and Thutmose III were too well
documented, and interestingly, Thutmose III ruled as co-regent with his
step-mother and aunt. He was also NOT
Thutmose II's eldest son, but the son of Thutmose II's second wife,
Iset. This would make sense with the
Biblical account because Pharaoh's oldest son died during the last plague, and
Pharaoh himself likely died in the Red Sea when he led the Egyptian armies
into it after the Israelites. With so
many of the Egyptians dead from plagues and from the Red Sea, who would be
left but Thutmose II's wife and aunt to help Thutmose III lead Egypt out of
such a terrible time. Here is what
Wikipedia has to say about Thutmose II: Thutmose II is one of the more
popular candidates for the Pharaoh of the Exodus. Alfred Edersheim proposes
in his Old Testament Bible History that Thutmose II is best qualified to be
the pharaoh of Exodus based on the fact that he had a brief, prosperous reign
and then a sudden collapse with no son to succeed him. His widow Hatshepsut
then became first Regent (for Thutmose III) then Pharaoh in her own right.
Edersheim states that Thutmose II is the only Pharaoh's mummy to display
cysts, possible evidence of plagues that spread through the Egyptian and
Hittite Empires at that time.
|
1387
|
Comments
Post a Comment